You must post 2 times before next Monday, December 5th. Your first post should be submitted by Thursday, December 1st. It is to be in response to one of the prompts below. The second time you post, it must be in response to or in reaction to the post of another student.1. One Hundred Years of Solitude is seeped in symbolism, allegory, hyperbole and parable. (These literary terms are defined below.) Why do you think Gabriel Garcia Marquez chooses to write his narrative in this way? Choose an aspect of the novel that makes use of one of the aforementioned literary devices then attempt to give meaning to it.
Symbolism: a word or phrase referring to a concrete object, scene, or action which also has some further significance associated with it
Allegory: a story or visual image with a second distinct meaning partially hidden behind its literal or visible meaning. The principal technique of allegory is personification. In written narrative, allegory involves a continuous parallel between two or more levels of meaning in the story. An allegory may be conceived as a metaphor that is extended into a structured system.
Hyperbole: Exaggeration for the sake of emphasis
Parable: A brief tale intended to be understood as an allegory illustrating some moral or lesson.
2. Choose a particular character to evaluate. Determine whether the character traits you have noted are ultimately positive or negative, or both. Explain your reasoning. For example Jose Arcadio Buendia: He is inventive and spends many hours alone on his alchemy experiments trying to discover already known science. This is ultimately negative, because he isolates himself from his family and eventually goes mad.
3. Identify elements of the story that you find particularly confusing, interesting, or worthy of discussion. Pose your own questions. Include portions of the text that you feel contribute to your questions/your point. Cite page numbers.
I can't decide if I think Amaranta is a good person or bad. She just wanted to find love, which is understandable. What makes me think that she is a negative person is the fact that she did so many negative things to hurt Pietro and Rebecca. If she really loved him, she wouldn't want to hurt him. She would just want him to be happy.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Andrea, I think that she was desperate to find love but I think she took it too far. If she truely loved Pietro she would have let him be happy with Rebecca. But even when Pietro did decided to want Amaranta she rejected him extremely harshly. If she truely loved him she would have either still wanted to be with him, or found a nicer way to let him down.
ReplyDeleteI am going to evaluate the character Amaranta. For a positive thing, she eventually lets Pietro go and lets him have her sister. But for a negative thing, a while later she leads Pietro on telling him that she loves him and wants to be with him. She leads him on for a while and when he proposes to her, she says no and tells him that she wouldn't marry him even if she was dead. Then he kills himself and she feels like its all her fault. For the negative thing, she thinks its her fault for Pietro's death so she excludes herself from her family and burns her hand to remind her that she did.
ReplyDeleteWhat im going to talk about is whether JAB is actually crazy or not. I think that he is legitimately insane. My reason being is that he randomly started to speak gibberish which is not a normal occurrence. I think that when the priest said that he was in fact speaking Latin i think that the priest was just saying this to gain some authority because people might think the priest was a bit more credible after making that observation.
ReplyDeleteI am actually going to disagree with Andrea. My reason being that Amaranta did these things only because she was in love with Pietro and people tend to do things such as what she did when they are in love. She was in no way going to allow Pietro to marry another so she pulled out every stop to ensure that.
ReplyDelete